R.C. Jain, Presiding Member—Aggrieved by the order dated 30.6.2005 passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bangalore (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in complaint No.76 of 1998 M/s Rinac India Ltd. & another (original opposite parties in the complaint), have filed the present appeal. By the impugned order, the State Commission has allowed the complaint filed by the complainant Karnataka Regional Engineering College Society (in short ‘the KRECS’) by giving the following directions to the opposite parties appellants:

“(a) The complaint is allowed opposite parties are directed to replace the machineries/articles referred to in Annexure-A of the complaint and make the compressor and other accessories in workable condition without any further defects within three months.

(b) In the alternative, if the OPs failed to replace the machineries/articles referred to in Annexure-A of the complaint within three months as directed above, the OPs are directed to pay Rs.17,17,500 to the complainant with interest at 12% p.a. from the date of the complaint till realization subject to handing over possession of the machineries/articles referred to above to the OPs.