SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.C.VYAS, V.K.PATIL, VEENA MISRA
Manish Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Dhandhuram Sahu – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Shri M. Rajshekhar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Shri S. Khan, Advocate.

ORDER (ORAL)

S.C. Vyas, President—Feeling aggrieved by order dated 3.9.09, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (hereinafter called “District Forum” for short), in complaint case No.193/08, this appeal has been preferred by the or of that complaint case, who has been directed to pay Rs.2,46,440 along with interest by way of compensation to the complainant respondent on account of loss to the goods loaded in the transport vehicle of the appellant herein and was being transported to another destination.

2. In nutshell the case of the complainant, before District Forum, was that on retirement he was to transport his household articles from Bilaspur to his home village Aurethi. The appellant herein was contacted for that purpose and goods were loaded in vehicle No. CG0A-5010 £or the purpose of transport. Fare of Rs.1,600 was agreed between the parties out of which, Rs.500 was paid in advance. In the way the vehicle caught fire and household articles of the complainant respondent were burnt totally, on account of that fire. As per the assertion of the complainant, the value of the goods loaded in the truck was Rs.2,46,440. He demanded that amount from the OP and













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top