SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BARKAT ALI ZAIDI, M.L.SAHNI
Canara Bank – Appellant
Versus
Arjun Dass – Respondent


ORDER (ORAL)

Barkat Ali Zaidi, President—The short facts of the case are that the respondent complainant had opened two accounts in the Canara Bank, Raja Garden Branch No. (i) CAN SI A/c 87/92 and (ii) Saving Bank Account No. 13634 in the month of November 1992 with the appellant OP bank which the complainant operated till middle of 1993, but as averred, since he became ill he lost his memory, and was not able to operate the accounts for 12 years. Therefore, the complainant approached OP in the month of March-April, 2005, to find out, the balance in his accounts and the bank replied, that the records of the bank were destroyed. The bank further averred that after a lapse of 8 years from the year of non-operation of the accounts the records of the said accounts are destroyed.

2. The complainant, therefore, filed a complaint before the bank ombudsman, and the ombudsman, after hearing both the parties found no deficiency on the part of the bank.

3. The complainant ultimately, therefore, filed a complaint before the District Consumer Forum praying that the OP bank be directed to pay him Rs.35,902 towards his Savings Bank Account No.13634 and Rs.12,000 towards CAN SI A/c 87/92.

4. The








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top