SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SYED ALI AZHAR RIZVI, BHANWAR SINGH
Ganesh Prasad Tewari – Appellant
Versus
District Inspector of Schools – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: None.
For the Respondent No. 1: None.
For the Respondent No. 2:Mr. S.K. Shukla, Advocate.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Bhanwar Singh, President—The case called out. Sri S.K. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/complainant is present.

2. None is present on behalf of the appellant and the respondent No.1.

3. As this appeal was filed way back in the year 2003 and obviously pretty old, we consider it appropriate to decide it on merit.

4. The issue in dispute pertains to the date of birth of the two sons of the respondent/complainant Sri Kailash Nath, who were admitted in Durga Model Higher Secondary School, Anand Nagar, Rawatpur, Kanpur Nagar. According to the respondent his son Sri Umesh Kumar was born on 10.5.1988 while his date of birth in the transfer certificate issued by the aforesaid school is mentioned as 10.7.1985. Likewise, the date of birth of the complainant’s other son Sri Chandresh Kumar was wrongly shown as 15.6.1987 instead of his correct date of birth 6.5.1989. Sri Kailash Nath filed his complaint praying for compensation of Rs.4,00,000 with the allegation that the wrong mentioning of dates resulted in the harassment of his two sons as they could not be admitted in the next class for which the transfer certificates were obtained. It was also alleged that alt







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top