R.C.JAIN, ANUPAM DASGUPTA
V. Naryanan – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank, Nungambakkam Branch – Respondent
R.C. Jain, Presiding Member— Through this appeal, the original complainant, namely, Mr. V.Narayanan seeks to challenge the order dated 13.04.2010 passed by the Tamil Nadu States Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai ( in short, ‘the State Commission’) in C.C.S.R. No.189 of 2010, whereby complaint of the complainant was dismissed as vexatious and complainant was saddled with the cost of Rs.10,000/- which he has been called upon to deposit in the Legal Aid Account of the State Commission within one month by means of a demand draft with the stipulation that in case the cost is not deposited, the same may be realized by invoking the provisions of section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
2. We have heard Mr. Vipin Gogia, learned counsel representing the appellant at great length and have given our thoughtful consideration to his submissions. Before we dwell on the same, we would like to briefly notice the background preceding the complaint before the State Commission. It would appear that the complainant is a partner of Sealark Fisheries which owned fishing boats for its business. In 1976, Sealark Fisheries had availed of agricultural loan of Rs.1.75 lakh from the opp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.