SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.R.UDAYABHANU
World Wide Immigration Consultancy Service – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Radha Shambu – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Vettoor S. Prakash, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. A. Subramonian, Advocate.

ORDER

K.R. Udayabhanu, President—The appellants are the opposite parties in CC No.137/2003 in the file of CDRF, Thiruvananthapuram. The appellants are under orders to pay a sum of Rs. 30,000 with compensation of Rs.1,500 and costs of Rs.1,000 to the complainant as well as interest at 12% if the amounts are not paid within 2 months from the date of receipt of the order.

2. The case of the complainant is that he paid a sum of Rs.30,000 to the opposite parties for arranging Canadian Permanent Visa. The opposite parties failed to provide the same causing much financial and mental strain to the complainant. They have also refused to refund the amount received and promised only to return Rs.15,000.

3. The opposite parties have contended that the Forum has no jurisdiction in view of the arbitration clause in the agreement and that the venue of the arbitration is agreed to be at Chandigarh. It is also contended that the amount of Rs.30,000 is not refundable. It is alleged that the necessary documents were not submitted despite repeated reminders. It is also contended that the complainant was directed to learn French which is mandatory for immigration.

4. The evidence adduced consisted of t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top