Mrs. Vineeta Rai, member—The present revision petition has been filed by Milan Barot and others (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Petitioners’) being aggrieved by the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gujarat (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’) in favour of Mukesh Haridat Bhatt and others (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Respondent’).

2. The facts of the case according to the Respondent (original complainants before the District Forum) was that he had decided to purchase Bungalow No.A/8 in the Satyasai Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. From the Petitioners on 21.02.2001. The Respondent took a loan of Rs.6.50 lakhs and thereafter made an initial payment of Rs.8 lakhs and a cash payment of Rs.45,000/-. The Petitioners enhanced the price of the bungalow to Rs.9,52,750/- and also asked the Respondent to pay Rs.20,000/- for “margin land” and Rs.50,000/- for legal charges which the Respondent paid even though the Petitioners were not entitled to demand this amount under the provisions of Gujarat Ownership Flat Act, 1963. The Respondent further contended that he had spent another Rs.2 lakhs on furniture and fixtures for use in the above bun