SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011(3) CPR 274
MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL
S.K. Kulshrestha, President; Mrs. Pramila S. Kumar and Mrs. Neerja Singh, Members
Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. Ltd. —Appellant
versus
Munnalal Jain —Respondent
First Appeal No. 554 of 2010
Decided on 25.3.2010

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Dr. (Ms.) Sapna Aggarwal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

IMPORTANT POINT
Electricity Bill cannot be raised for a period beyond 2 years.

Headnote:Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Sections 15 and 17—Electricity Act, 2003—Section 56(2) —Electricity—Bill—Domestic connection—Bill of Rs. 55,165/- given to complainant—If the amount is recoverable for period exceeding two years preceding on date when sum became first due, it cannot be recovered unless such sum has been shown continuously as recoverable as arrear of charges for electricity supplied—Bills were not reaching subscriber and the amount mounted to Rs. 55,165/-Appeal disposed of with modification in award passed by District Forum. (Paras 2 to 4)

       AIR 2007 Bombay 52 Referred to.

       

ORDER (ORAL)

S.K. Kulshrestha, President—The appellant (original opposite party) has filed this appeal against the order dated 19.1.2010 of the District Forum, Morena passed in case No. 228/2009. The complainant has been granted domestic connection of electricity. A bill of Rs. 55,165 was given to the complainant. It is not disputed that this bill also covered the arrears of the preceding period of two years. We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant. Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 provides as under:

“56(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no sum due from any consumer, under this section shall be recoverable after the period of two years from the date when such sum became first due unless such sum has been shown continuously as recoverable as arrear of charges for electricity supplied and the licensee shall not cut off the supply of the electricity.”

2. From a bare perusal of the said provision it is clear that if the amount is recoverable for a period exceeding two years preceding on the date when the sum became first due, it cannot be recovered unless such sum has been shown continuously as recoverable as arrear of charges for electricity supplied and the licensee shall not cut off the supply of the electricity. The period shall be confined to the period of two years. It is this order that has been passed by the District Forum.

3. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the order has been passed on misreading of the evidence. The bills were regularly sent to the connection holder, therefore, the provision of Section 56(2) was not attracted. Learned Counsel also placed reliance on Awadesh S. Pandey v. Tata Power Co. Ltd.1 We find that the contention of the learned Counsel has no merit. It is true that the bills were not reaching the subscriber and the amount had mounted to Rs. 55,165. The provision of Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 clearly prohibits raising of the bills for a period beyond two years. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not uphold the direction of the District Forum to award compensation of Rs. 1,000 and Rs. 500 as costs of the proceedings.

4. With the above modification, this appeal is disposed of.

Appeal disposed of with modification

in award.

*********



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top