SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUNIL KUMAR GARG, VIMLA SETHIA, SASHI KUMAR PAREEK
Dena Bank – Appellant
Versus
Radha Raman Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Prakash Pareek, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Heard at admission stage. Delay of 58 days in filing the appeal is condoned taking into consideration that the impugned order dated 23.12.2009 was passed against the appellant ex parte.

2. This appeal has been filed by the appellant bank which was OP before the District Forum-I, Jaipur against the order dated 23. 12.2009 passed by the District Forum-I, Jaipur in complaint No. 335/08 by which the complaint of the complainant/respondent was allowed ex parte against the appellant bank in the manner that the appellant bank was directed that the appellant bank would pay interest on Rs.2,000 w.e.f. 11.3.2008 upto 23.12.2009 @ 6% p.a. and further to pay Rs.2,000 as amount of compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,500 as amount of cost of litigation to the complainant/respondent within one month failing which the appellant bank would further pay interest on the above amount @ 12% p.a.

3. It may be stated here that the complainant/respondent was having an ATM card of the appellant bank and as per the case of the complainant/respondent the appellant bank had wrongly deducted a sum of Rs.2,000 from his account No.10336 and when he made a complaint with the official of the appellant bank















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top