V.R.KINGAONKAR, VINAY KUMAR
Manohar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Administration – Respondent
V.R. Kingaonkar, Presiding Member—This appeal arises out of judgement and order rendered by State Consumer
Disputes redressal Commission, UT Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Commission’) in complaint case no. 60/2006 dismissing the complaint filed by the appellant.
2. It is an admitted fact that the respondents issued an advertisement dated 14.04.1981 for allotment of industrial plots of different types. The appellant submitted an application dated 20.05.1981 along with bank draft of Rs.5,000/- being the earnest money. Out of 3375 applicants, 339 were selected for the purpose of allotment of the plots on consideration of the project reports. The scrutiny committee of the respondents found that the appellant was eligible for allotment of two (2) kanal plot. By letter dated 12.11.82 he was allotted two kanal plot @Rs.70/- per sq. yard. He paid Rs.12,500/- on 10.12.1982 as per the demand. It is further an admitted fact that as a result of draw held on 30.11.1982, he was allotted plot no. 1289, industrial area, Phase – I as confirmed vide letter dated 23.12.1982. He deposited first instalment of Rs.9,225/- on 23.01.1984 by way of bank draft. He and s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.