SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.K.NAIK
R. K. Gupta – Appellant
Versus
V. K. Gupta, Senior Consultant Physician (General Medicine), Talwar Medical Centre – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant : Complainant-in-person.

ORDER

S.K. Naik, Presiding Member —Heard the complainant, who has appeared in person and has argued his case, at length.

2. The complainant, Dr. R.K. Gupta, submits that he is a doctor with Post Graduate Degree in Medicine (Anaesthesiology) and is presently working as Senior Consultant in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine. His brother Dr. V.K. Gupta, who is opposite party no.1, is also a doctor with Post Graduate Degree in General Medicine. The complainant, Dr. R.K. Gupta, contends that his brother Dr. V.K. Gupta, in order to rob him from his right of inheritance from the property of his deceased father, created a situation in which his mother sided and lived with his brother-opposite party no.1 and he had to stay away from his ancestral house with his family. The complainant, Dr. R.K. Gupta, alleges that his brother/opposite party no.1, Dr. V.K. Gupta, had a long term plan to eliminate his mother in a surreptitious manner so as to grab the entire ancestral property. In that process, he alleges that his brother had created sever toxicity in his mother over a period of time and did not allow her to consult any other doctor. When the degree of toxicity reached a level









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top