SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VIRENDER SINGH, MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Manohar Nath Pandita – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Z.S. Wattali, Advocate.
For the Respondent:C.J. Dhar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Virender Singh, J—Oriental Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter to be referred to as the appellant), being aggrieved of order/award dated 6.1.2003 passed by J&K State Consumer Protection Commission, Jammu (hereinafter to be referred to as State Commission whereby directing the appellant to pay Rs.4,97,247 with 9% interest to the respondent (hereinafter to be referred to as complainant) has preferred the instant appeal, which already stands admitted after condoning the delay. Execution of the award stands stayed during the pendency of the appeal and a sum of Rs. l,45,175 has also been released in favour of the complainant.

2. Flashback of the facts, in brief, is that the complainant being a migrant from Kashmir had got his residential building situate at Fatehpora, Bungam, District Anantnag (Kashmir) insured with the appellant for an amount of Rs.6,00,000. It was gutted in fire by the militants on the night intervening 2nd/ 3rd of August, 1999. An information was lodged with the concerned police about the incident, upon which, a formal FIR was registered under Section 436 R.P .C. with Police Station Anantnag. The complainant raised the claim with the appellant, upon which

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top