Anupam Dasgupta, Presiding Member—This revision petition challenges the order dated 27.06.2011 passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in MA no. 46 of 2011 in FA no. 3426 of 2010. By this order, the State Commission dismissed the miscellaneous application filed by the petitioner herein by observing as under:

“6. Admittedly the appeal no. 3426 of 2010 was again posted for hearing on admission on 17.02.2011. Appellant did not make any representation. Though sufficient and reasonable opportunity was given to the appellant and advocate earlier, they did not represent their case. On 17.02.2011 also they failed to appear. Hence, appeal came to be dismissed for non-prosecution.

7. Then Miscellaneous Petition no. 21 of 2011 was filed on 25.02.2011. Thereafter also, there is no proper representation. The earlier advocate on record Sri. Nagaraj N. Naidu did not represent. Then it appears on the basis of ‘No Objection’, present advocate took the vakalath on 20.05.2011. At that time, it was informed him that the case is posed on 25.05.2011. He was present in the Commission on that day, but the Miscellaneous Petit