S.B.Mhase, President—Heard Mr. Suhas Deokar—Advocate for the appellant.

This appeal is directed as against the decision of Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Pune in consumer complaint No.130/2010. It was decided on 30.6.2011. By this order complaint filed by the respondent No.1 has been partly allowed and the appellant has been directed to provide electric meter and give possession of 800 sq. ft. flat without charging anything for the conveyance. As stated in the MOU dated 11.8.2008 appellant has been also directed to give monthly compensation of Rs. 25,000 from 11.8.2010 till delivery of actual possession and by way of cost of the complaint amount of Rs. 5,000 has been awarded. Being aggrieved by this order, original opponent who is builder and developer has preferred this appeal. MOU is on record. Land has been given for the development by the respondent and in consideration of that appellant has agreed to provide one flat bearing no.101. Since the said flat has not been given the complaint was filed. MOU between the parties is not disputed. Attempt has been made to point out that the said document is without any consideration and thereby to contend that