SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHAM SUNDER, NEENA SANDHU
Ravinder Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ashutosh Goyal @ Ashu Goyal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sh.Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Sham Sunder, President—This appeal is directed against the order dated 01.01.2009, rendered by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum- I, U.T., Chandigarh (hereinafter to be called as the District Forum only) vide which, it accepted the complaint, and directed the Opposite Parties, as under:-

“In view of above discussion, we are of the opinion that the present complaint must succeed. The same is accordingly, allowed. The OPs are directed to refund to the Complainant a sum of Rs.6.50 lacs along with interest @9% per annum on the aforesaid amount from the date of the respective deposits till realization, along with a compensation of Rs.10,000/- for mental agony and harassment suffered by him at the hands of OPs and for adopting an unfair trade practice by the OPs. The order shall be complied with by the OPs within 30 days from the receipt of the copy of the order, failing which they will be liable to pay the amount along with penal interest @12% per annum from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 12.06.2008, till realization. The OPs shall also pay costs of litigation, which is quantified at Rs.500/’’.

2. The facts, in brief, are that the complainant (now re





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top