ASHOK BHAN, VINEETA RAI
UHBVNL – Appellant
Versus
Chamela Ram – Respondent
Ashok Bhan, President— Petitioner herein which was the Opposite Party before the District Forum has filed this Revision Petition against the order dated 20.7.2007 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, UT Chandigarh (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in appeal No. 202/2007 whereby the State Commission has dismissed the appeal filed by the Petitioner. District Forum had allowed the complaint directing the Petitioner to remove the high tension wires passing over the roof of the house of the complainant and electric pole standing in the plot of the Complainant within six months at their own costs.
Facts:
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the high tension wires were passing over the roof of the house of the complainant and a pole was also standing in the plot adjoining to the house of the complainant in which he was to construct a room. Due to electric pole standing in the plot complainant was not able to raise construction in the said plot. There was a danger to the life and the property of the complainant due to the high tension wires. Complainant approached the Petitioner a number of times to remove the high tension wires and the electric
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.