SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, SURESH CHANDRA
Malkiat Kaur – Appellant
Versus
LIC of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner In both the RPs:Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate.

ORDER

J.M. Malik, Presiding Member—These two revision petitions will be decided by the same judgment as both of them entail the same question of fact and law. The deceased is the son and husband respectively of both the Revisionists/Complainants. The case of both the petitioners is that Sanjeev Kumar alias Jasvir Singh, since deceased, is known by both the names, Sanjeev Singh alias Jasbir Singh obtained the Insurance Policy from LIC of India, Respondent No.1, for a sum of Rs. 3 lacs on 28.03.2006. At the time of Insurance, he had undergone medical examination and other tests. Unfortunately, Jasvir Singh died of sudden Cardiac arrest on 5.6.2006 at the age of 37 yeaRs. The petitioner Smt. Malkiat Kaur, who is the mother of the deceased life assured, is nominee U/s 45 of the Insurance Act. She applied for the claim under LIC for payment of sum assured with accrued bonus but the same was repudiated by the respondent LIC illegally, arbitrarily and wrongly on the false ground of alleged concealment material information of the status of nationality, identity and his occupation as agriculturist.

2. The case of Gurpreet Kaur W/o Jasvir Singh in Revision Petition No. 736 of 2012 is this. H










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top