SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.C.VYAS, V.K.PATIL
J. K. Dani – Appellant
Versus
Amrit Lal Yadav – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant:Mukesh Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Rakesh Pandey, Advocate.

ORDER

S.C. Vyas, President—This appeal is directed against order 22.10.2009, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Korba (hereinafter called “District Forum” for short) in complaint case No.51/2003, whereby the appellant herein has been directed to pay Rs.2,00,000/ - with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint, till the date of payment, on the allegation that he committed negligence while performing surgical operation on the eye of the complainant, resulting in total loss of vision. In addition to it, he has also been directed to pay Rs.10,000/ -as compensation for mental and physical agony and Rs.2,000/ -as cost of litigation.

2. Indisputably, the respondent/complainant reached to the Hospital of the appellant on 23.11.2000 with complaint of having cataract in the right eye. The appellant after examination advised for surgical operation for removal of cataract and for implantation of artificial lense. The complainant was admitted on 26.11.2000 in the Hospital and was operated on 27.11.2000. As per allegations in the complaint, after two days when bandage was removed, then it was found that the complainant was incapable of seeing anything through















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top