V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member—In this appeal there is challenge to order dated 6.9.2011, Passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula (for short as ‘State Commission’). Alongwith it an application for condonation of delay has also been filed.

2. Appellant (complainant before State Commission) in its complaint has stated that he has been carring on the business of crane service under the name and style of “Gurubaksh Logistic India” and is its Managing Director. He had purchased four Hydraulic Mobile Cranes during different period from respondent No.1/ opposite party No.1. It is further stated that appellant is earning his livelihood from the machines in question. Above stated cranes developed defects within warranty period. Despite repeated services provided by the respondents for repairing these machines, defects could not be rectified. Thereafter, appellant approached respondents to replace these machines with new one or to refund its price. However, respondent No. 1 refused to accept to this request. Thereafter, appellant served a legal notice, to which there was no response, Hence, complaint was filed before the State Commission.

3. Respondents in their