SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VINAY KUMAR, J.M.MALIK
SBI Life Insurance Co. – Appellant
Versus
Kambala Sandhya – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kapil Chawla, Advocate.

ORDER

Vinay Kumar, Member—The matter in this revision petition arises out of repudiation of a life insurance claim by the revision petitioner SBI Life Insurance Co. Ltd. on 17.6.2009. The claim of the Complainant, under the policy arose from the death of the insured (husband of the Complainant) on 14.9.2008 at Seven Hills Hospital, Visakhapatnam. The letter of repudiation stated that:-

“On scrutiny of claim documents, we have noted that in the proposal for insurance dated 15.07.2006 Life Assured had answered the questions in the proposal form as follows:

Q. Question Answer

No.

Q 7 (iii) During the last 10 years have

you undergone or advised to undergo hospitalization, an operation or any investigation or medical treatment? No

Q 7 (xii) Are you suffering from, or did you suffer in the past from Digestive

Disorder? No

Q 7 (xxi) Do you have diabetes or were

you ever diagnosed the same? No

As per the records available with us, Late Masenu Kambala was diagnosed for Erosive Duodenitis and Diabetes prior to the date of commencement of policy.”

Thus, the deceased Life Assured had not disclosed the material facts at the time of signing the contract of insurance. The claim is he


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top