SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.P.DHOLAKIA, S.A.MAKHIJA, JYOTIBEN P.JANI
Bhoomi Tractors Sales and Services – Appellant
Versus
Nileshchandra C Patel – Respondent


ORDER

Jyoti P. Jani, Member—The present Civil Misc. Application has been filed by the original opponent No.1 seeking condonation of delay caused in filing the appeal against order dated 30.9.2009 passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Valsad in Complaint No.95 of 2009.

2. Heard Mr. Milan Dudhiya, learned Advocate for the applicant. According to the applicant, the delay is of 735 days. The cause of delay as stated is that no notice of the complaint was served upon the applicant by the Forum and free copy of the order was also not forwarded to the applicant. The present applicant obtained certified copy from the District Forum on 10.1.2012. Hence, the actual delay caused from the receipt of the certified copy of the order is 4 days but the delay from the date of the order is of 735 days. Hence, in the interest of justice, the said delay be condoned.

3.Mr. Dudhiya has argued that the original notice of the complaint has not been served upon the applicant. On perusal of the postal acknowledgement, it transpires that the notice has been served upon Rajubhai Halani, Proprietor of Bhoomi Tractors Sales and Service. A reference be made yet to the notice correspondence between th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top