V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member—In this revision petition there is challenge to order dated 8.2.2012, passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai (for short, ‘State Commission’) vide which appeal of the respondent/opposite party was allowed challenging the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chennai (South) (for short as ‘District Forum’) in Complaint Case No.17/2007) allowing the complaint of the petitioner/complainant, vide order dated 13.5.2010.

2. Brief facts are that petitioner took “Hospitalzation and Domicilliary Hospitalization Benefit “Mediclaim Policy alongwith his wife from the respondent for the period from 14.10.2004 to 13.10.2005 and renewed the same from 14.10.2005 to 13.10.2006. Petitioner was admitted in the hospital on 15.1.2006 and Angiogram Treatment was given to him on 6.1.2006 and was advised by the doctors for heart surgery. Petitioner was admitted himself in M/s. Madras Medical Mission Hospital at Moggappair, Chennai and had undergone Bypass Heart Surgery on 12.1.2006 and was discharged on 25.1.2006. Petitioner preferred a claim with the respondent for Rs.2,71,000/- being the medical and hospitalization expenses. The cla