SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.CHAUDHARI, SURESH CHANDRA
Subodh Kumar Baheti – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mrs. Vikas Jain, Advocate.

ORDER

Suresh Chandra, Member—Petitioner – Subodh Kumar Baheti who is resident of Bhilwara, Rajasthan filed a consumer complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhilwara, Rajasthan against the OPs No.1 & 2, namely, Delhi Development Authority, New Delhi and Nodal Branch of ICICI Bank, Green Park Extension, New Delhi who are respondents No.1 & 2 respectively herein.

2. Briefly stated, petitioner had applied for allotment of a house by the DDA and sent the requisite form dated 8.9.2008 along with a demand draft of Rs.1,50,000/-. Since the allotment was not done under the scheme, the petitioner wrote to respondent No.1 demanding refund of his application money of Rs.1,50,000/-. Having failed to get the refund in spite of several letters followed by a legal notice, the complaint in question came to be filed by the petitioner before the District Forum at Bhilwara. On being noticed, the respondent No.1 submitted that it had already instructed respondent No.2 Bank which was the nodal branch to refund the amount in question to the petitioner. It also raised the plea of lack of territorial jurisdiction of the District Forum, Bhilwara and pleaded for dismissal of the comp





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top