R.C.JAIN, S.K.NAIK
VRL Logistic Ltd. , (Formerly M/s. Vijayanand Roadlines Limited) – Appellant
Versus
M. M. Gears Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
R.C. Jain, Presiding Member—Aggrieved by the order dated 07.03.2011 passed by the Tamil Nadu Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai in First Appeal No. 18 of 2009 M/s. VRL Logistic Ltd. & Ors. Have filed the present petition purportedly under Section 21-B of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. By the said order, the State Commission has dismissed the above numbered appeal for default by observing as under:
“DOCKET ORDER
No representation for appellant. As seen from the notes paper, which disclose that appellant was not present for the past two hearings, also not filed written arguments. Today also the appellant is not present and there is no representation also, thereby showing the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the petition on file. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default.”
2. Along with the petition, the complainant has filed an application under Section 14 (2) of the Consumer Protection Regulations 2005 for condonation of delay of 351 days in filing the present Revision Petition.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on the application for condonation of delay. He submi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.