SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, VINAY KUMAR
Indian Airlines – Appellant
Versus
K. Balachandran Thampi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vikash Soni, Advocate.

ORDER

Vinay Kumar, Member—M/s. Indian Airlines (presently known as “Air India Ltd.”) have challenged the common order of the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commisision in Appeal No. 329 of 2012 (appellant-Indian Airlines) and Appeal No. 575/2011 (appellant K. Balachandran Thampi). These two are cross-appeals filed by the OP and the complainant, arising out of the same matter before the District Forum. The District Forum had allowed the complaint of Mr. K. Balachandran Thampi and the appeal of the OP/India Airlines has been dismissed by the State Commission.

2. From a perusal of the records, pleadings of the parties and arguments before the fora below, we find that OP/Indian Airlines has expended considerable amount of effort in justifying the delay and eventual cancellation of the flight. Their focus on the manner in which the delay and cancellation were handled vis-a-vis the passengers, has been much less than required as the complaint is about the deficiency of service to the passengers resulting from the manner of handelling of the delay and cancellation. It is not whether delay was technically justifiable or not. The case of the complainant is that:

“The complainants r












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top