ASHOK PARIHAR, ANIL KUMAR MISHRA, SUNITA RANKA
Superintendent of Post Offices – Appellant
Versus
Geeta Sharma – Respondent
Since on similar set of facts common order passed by the District Forum, Tonk in nine complaints is under challenge, all the above appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.
2. All the above nine complainants are residents of a small township Niwai in District Tonk of Rajasthan. To encourage small saving scheme a Special Senior Citizen Saving Scheme was launched by the Central Government in the year 2004. Being the senior citizens all the nine complainants deposited Rs. 27 lacs in their individual account of Rs. 1,00,000 each at different times between 2006-2007. After depositing the above amount under the scheme referred above, the complainants were also paid regular interest on the amount deposited by them upto December 2008. However, as has been alleged by the appellants a notice dated 28.7.2009 was issued to all the complainants that in view of some audit objections all the accounts opened by them under the particular scheme were irregular and against the provisions of the scheme. Thus, they were not entitled for any interest on the amount so deposited. No interest from January 2009 was paid to any complainant however, the amount deposited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.