SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.M.Malik, Vinay Kumar
Masih Hospital Through its Incharge, Dr. R. Masih – Appellant
Versus
Kuleep – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the petitioners:Mr. Naveen Pandey, Advocate.

ORDER

J.M. Malik, Presiding Member—In this revision petition, we are dealing with the allegation of medical negligence on the part of the petitioners/OPs, i.e. Masih Hospital through its Incharge, Dr. R.Masih, Yamuna Nagar, No.1, Dr.R.Masih, No.2 and Dr.Suman Masih, No.3. For the purpose of reimbursement of any compensation amount, United India Insurance Co.Ltd. has been arrayed as Respondent No.3, in this case.

2. The facts germane to the present case are these. Smt.Geeta Devi, since deceased, was the wife of Sh. Kuldeep, complainant No.1. Smt.Gita Devi was in a family way. The patient was a primigravida (pregnant with first child) She felt labour pains. She was admitted in the hospital/OP1 on 16.12.2007. The Doctor assured her that the delivery would be normal. Subsequently, she was told that cesarean operation was required. The patient was asked to deposit a sum of Rs.12,000/- on account of operation fee and hospitalization. The said amount was accordingly deposited.

3. On the same day, cesarean operation was conducted and Smt.Geeta Devi gave birth to a female child. However, the condition of Smt.Geeta Devi did not improve. As per advise given by the OPs, Smt.G
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top