K.S.Chaudhari, B.C.Gupta
Lakhmi Chand – Appellant
Versus
Reliance General Insurance – Respondent
B.C. Gupta, Member—Appeared on 11.04.2013 at the time of arguments,
This revision petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 29.02.2012 passed by the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula (hereinafter referred to as “State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 1396 of 2011, vide which appeal against the order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sonepat dated 18.08.2011 was accepted and consumer complaint in question, dismissed. The District Forum, Sonepat vide their order dated 18.8.2011 in consumer complaint No. 517 of 2010 had allowed the said complaint; the original complainant has therefore, filed the present revision petition before this Commission.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the complainant / petitioner is the owner of the Tata vehicle ACE-E-3 bearing Number HR-67-7492 and the same was insured with the respondent / opp. party vide policy No. 15019923334104992 with effect from 31.07.2009 to 30.07.2010. The said vehicle met with an accident on 11.02.2010 against the offending vehicle bearing No. UP-75-J 9880 and an FIR No. 66/10 dated 11.02.2010 under Sec
3. B.V. Nagaraju v. Oriental Insurance Company
5. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sony Cheriyan decided on 19.08.1999. by the Hon’ble Supreme Court
6. Vikram Greentech (I) Ltd., & Anr. v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
7. Export Credit Guarantee Corpn. Of India Ltd. v. Garg Sons International bas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.