V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member—Being aggrieved by order dated 29.3.2012, passed by Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bhopal (for short, ‘State Commission’) petitioner/complainant has filed this revision petition.

2. Brief facts are that on 29.5.2007 petitioner feeling weakness and fever went for check-up at respondent no.1/OP-1 hospital. After check up by respondent no.2/OP-2, he was sent to pathology lab for blood group test. Reasons for fever and weakness was stated to be deficiency of haemoglobin by respondent no.2 and petitioner was advised blood transfusion. After transfusion of the blood, petitioner was discharged from the hospital. Later on, he complained about weakness and went to another hospital. There petitioner was found that both his kidneys have been damaged and he had undergone dialysis. Due to negligence and wrong blood transfusion, his kidney got damaged and he got the kidney transplanted. Accordingly, petitioner filed a complaint before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ujjain (for short, ‘District Forum’) claiming compensation of Rs.16,30,000/- with 18% interest.

3. District Forum allowed the complaint of the petitioner,