V.B.Gupta, Rekha Gupta
Tata Motors Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ravikant Garg – Respondent
V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member—Being aggrieved by order dated 6.9.2010, passed by Uttarakhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Dehradun (short, “State Commission”) petitioners/opposite party nos.1 and 2 have filed this revision petition.
2. Brief facts are that respondent/complainant Shri Ravikant Garg purchased one Tata Indica Car on 31.12.1999 from the authorized dealer of petitioner no.1, namely M/s Hind Motors, Chandigarh for an amount of Rs.2,90,064/-. The said car was got registered with the Transport Department vide Registration no. UP-07-L-3863. There was 18 months warranty on this car. First free service of this car was got done from the service centre of the petitioner No.1 situated at New Delhi. Thereafter, all next free services and repairs were got done from petitioner No.2. But since very beginning, problems of excessive consumption of engine oil, rasping of tyres, problem of alignment and of gear were found in this vehicle. Petitioner No.2 fulfilled the deficiency of engine oil from time and again and its price was also charged from the respondent. Tyres were also changed but the above defect could not be cured. On 17.12.2000, respondent sent a reg
2. DVVG Satyanarayanan v. S.V. Raghavaiah
6. Swaraj Mazda v. P.K. Chakkarpore
9. EID Parry (India) v. Baby Benjamin Thushara
11. Susheel Kumar Gabgotra v. Maruti Udyog Ltd
12. Unity & Trust v. Chairman & M.D., Bank of Baroda
13. Union of India v. Seppo Rally
14. Godfrey Philips v. Ajay Kumar
15. S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath
16. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. R. Srinivasan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.