Om Prakash VS Branch Manager Annagran Finance Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

V.B.Gupta, Rekha Gupta
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Branch Manager Annagran Finance Ltd. – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Nemo.

Judgement Key Points

Certainly. Based on the provided legal document, here are the key points:

The complaint was filed after a delay of more than ten years from the date the cause of action arose, which was on 15th October 1998 (!) (!) .
The petitioner did not provide sufficient reasons or a plausible explanation for the delay in filing the complaint, and thus the delay could not be condoned (!) (!) .
The District Forum and the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission rightly dismissed the complaint and appeal on the grounds of limitation, as the delay was excessive and unexcused (!) (!) (!) .
The revision petition was dismissed because there was no jurisdictional error, illegality, or infirmity in the orders passed by the lower authorities (!) .
The petitioner, who described himself as an advocate, was expected to be aware of the limitation period and the legal requirements for condoning delay under the applicable statutes (!) .
The petitioner was directed to deposit costs of Rs. 5,000 within eight weeks, failing which interest would accrue at 9% per annum until payment (!) .

Please let me know if you need further analysis or assistance with this case.

JUDGMENT

Rekha Gupta, Member—The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 11th January 2012 of the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow (the “State Commission”) in appeal no. 1316 of 2010.

2. The brief facts of the complaint as per the petitioner are as follows:

The respondents approached the petitioner’s wife Smt Jageshwari Devi, 227/288 but 288/240/1 Laxmi Sadan, Arya Nagar, Lucknow 226 004 (Uttar Pradesh) and got deposited amount and issued a letter as detailed below:

Reg. no. 1, 7463, LET No. 1 74970

Deposit No. IUCC 1031291, Interest rate 14%

Amount of Deposit is Rs. 11,715/-

Interest amount Rs. 803/-

Interest from date 25.04.1998

Pre – Maturity Date 15.10.1998

Warrant no. 25302

Interest amount payable Rs. 12,559/-

The respondents failed to pay back the amount as per promise letter.

3. The correspondence and personal approach at the local office at Lucknow with the respondents, application sent registered A/D letter under RTI Act, 2005 enclosing Indian Postal Order no. 57 E 74 8949 on 06.05.2009 but the respondent did not acknowledge the letter and also did not care to give any information till date.

4. A com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

V.B.Gupta, Rekha GuptaOm Prakash – AppellantVersusBranch Manager Annagran Finance Ltd. – Respondent

V.B.Gupta, Rekha Gupta
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Branch Manager Annagran Finance Ltd. – Respondent