Rekha Gupta, Member—Revision petition no. 4359 of 2012 has been filed against the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai, Circuit Bench at Aurangabad (the ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal no. 223 of 2008 and First Appeal no. 1356 of 2008, decided under a common judgment and order dated 27th July 2011, in complaint case no. 76 of 2006 by respondent nos. 1 and 2 who were complainants no. 1 and 2.

2. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Dhule (the ‘District Forum’) vide its order dated 31st January 2008 gave the following order:

(i) “The application filed by the applicant is against non-applicant nos. 1 and 2 and is partially allowed.

(ii) Within sixty days from the date of this order, the non-applicant nos. 1 and 2 shall complete the work of construction over plot no. 7 and shall deliver the possession and execute the sale deed.

(iii) It is after receipt of the possession as shown in column no. 2 of the order and after execution of the sale deed, the applicants shall pay an amount of Rs.1,20,000/- to the non-applicant nos. 1 and 2 towards the balance price consideration as per agreement.

(iv) As referred to above in column no. 2 of the or