Ms. Rekha Gupta, Member —Revision Petition no. 2814 of 2011 has been filed against the order dated 26.02.2011 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (‘the State Commission’) in appeal no. 771 of 2006.

2. Complaint of the respondent/ complainant in brief is as follows:

Respondent no. 1 is a progressive farmer residing at Atahrdi Tal Kalamb District Osmanabad. Petitioner/ OP no. 2 manufactures and sells Angad tractors and is a sole distributor for Maharashtra and respondent no. 2/ OP 1 is the authorised dealer for selling this tractor. He paid Rs.1,09,500/- as a tractor cost and Rs.24,100/- as a cost of plough thus the total amount was Rs.1,33,600/- and he received a discount of Rs.2,600/-. Thus respondent no. 2 handed over this tractor by taking Rs.1,31,000/-. Respondent no. 2 had orally committed to one year free service and given free service card along with service manual. Respondent no. 1 observed so many defects after working in actual field and hence he took the tractor to the showroom of respondent no. 2 and on 16.02.2005. Respondent no. 1 requested respondent no. 2 to resolve all the defects in this tractor and to repair it. The