SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Dhanraj Khamatkar, Narendra Kawde
Vatsala Rajan Vaidya – Appellant
Versus
Raj Homes S. V. Builders – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:H.B. Chavan, Advocate.

ORDER

Narendra Kawde, Member—This consumer complaint has been filed by the complainant alleging deficiency in service against the opponent, Raj Homes S.V. Builders and ors. (hereinafter referred to as “opponent builder/developer”) since the opponent builder/developer did not deliver possession of the flat as per the provisions of registered sale deed. Case in brief as pleaded by the complainant is summarized as under :

2. The complainant has entered into the agreement dated 21/01/2010 with the opponent builder/developer for purchase of flat no.601 on the 6th floor in ‘A’ Wing admeasuring 1033 sq.ft. at the agreed consideration of Rs. 65,14,400/- As per the agreement, construction of the flat was to be completed and the flat was to be handed after it is ready for use i.e. on or before 31st August, 2010. However, the opponent builder/developer failed to act as per the provisions of the agreement entered between the parties of the flat in stipulated time. The complainant for several times approached the opponent builder/developer for delivery of possession of the flat and subsequently issued notice through the advocate. All the efforts of the complainant to get the possession delivered




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top