SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.Chaudhari, B.C.Gupta
Nirula’s Potpourri, A Unit of South Asian Hospitality – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shalabh Singhal, Advocate.

ORDER

K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 7.5.2012 passed by Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in Appeal No. 1768 of 2011 – Nirula’s Potpourri Vs. Manoj Kumar Gupta by which, while dismissing appeal, order of District forum allowing complaint was upheld.

2. Brief facts of the case are that complainant/respondent was member of OP/petitioner and OP issued coupon to the complainant for discount at the time of dinner at OP-restaurant. On 6.11.2009, complainant along with his family members went to OP No. 2 for dinner and OP issued bill for Rs.2071.45 in which Rs.119.354 was charged for service and Rs.219/- and Rs.28/- for tax without mentioning type of tax and thus charged illegal tax. Alleging deficiency on the part of OP complainant filed complaint before District Forum. OP was proceeded ex-parte and learned District Forum after hearing complainant allowed complaint and directed OP to refund Rs.366.45 along with 9% p.a. interest and further directed OP to pay Rs.25,000/- as compensation to the complainant and Rs.25,000/- to be deposited with Stat
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top