SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.CHAUDHARI, B.C.GUPTA
Seema Garg – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Insurance – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S. K. Singh, Advocate.

ORDER

Dr. B.C. Gupta, Member—This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the impugned order dated 11.02.2013, passed by the Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Raipur (for short ‘the State Commission’) in appeal no. FA/12/403, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Seema Garg, vide which, while allowing appeal filed by the opposite party/respondent, Insurance Company, the order dated 08.06.2012 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh in case no. 95/2010, allowing the complaint in question, was set aside and the complaint was ordered to be dismissed.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that a trailer vehicle bearing registration no. CG-13A/9924 was insured with the Opposite Party/Insurance Company, vide policy no. 153300/31/2009/1130 from 05.05.2009 to 04.05.2010. The said vehicle was damaged in a road accident on 29.06.2009. A surveyor was appointed by the Insurance Company to assess the loss. However, the Insurance Company repudiated the claim, saying that the vehicle was not being driven by a person having a valid and effective driving licence at the relev




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top