SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.S.CHAUDHARI, B.C.GUPTA
HDFC Bank – Appellant
Versus
Vir Bhan Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Advocate
For the Respondent: In person.

ORDER

K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 21.08.2012 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in Appeal No. A/08/1250 – HDFC Vs. Vir Bhan Sharma by which, while dismissing appeal, order of District Forum allowing complaint was upheld.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Complainant/Respondent is an Advocate and purchased a primary and add on mediclaim policy for his family including his wife and minor daughter for Rs.2,00,000/- from OP/petitioner and paid Rs.950/- vide cheque dated 12.7.2004. OP issued two credit cards bearing No. 5176358010146727. On 26.8.2004, complainant’s wife Dr. Savita Sharma undergone Angioplasty and was discharged from hospital on 7.9.2004. Hospital raised bill for Rs.1,58,786.71 ps. Complainant could not avail mediclaim facility due to non-receipt of third party administrator Identity Card. OP sent three identity cards for the period 26.7.2005 to 25.7.2006, after more than a year from the receipt of the application. Alleging deficiency on the part of OP, complainant filed complaint before District Forum. OP re
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top