K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against theORDER dated 30.09.2013 passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in Appeal No. 1260 of 2010 – Reliance General Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Didar Singh & Anr. by which, while allowing appeal,ORDER of District Forum allowing complaint was set aside.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Complainant No. 1/Petitioner No. 1 was owner of truck/trolla No. PB – 10-AT-4479, who purchased it after taking loan from the Bank. Complainant No. 1 sold trolla to Complainant No. 2/Petitioner No. 2. The registration of vehicle could not be transferred in his name due to outstanding loan. Vehicle was got insured from OP/respondent for a period of one year from 6.9.2007 to 5.9.2008. Vehicle was stolen in the intervening night of 7/8.7.2008 and FIR was lodged on 8.7.2008, but vehicle was not traced. Claim submitted to the OP was repudiated on the ground that Major Singh had no insurable interest on the date of theft. Alleging deficiency on part of OP, complainants filed complaint before District Forum. OP/respondent resisted complaint and sub