SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rajshri Simant Sukale – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate.

ORDER

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member —The relevant facts in this revision are:

Mr. Simant Dattatraya Sukale, (since deceased), the husband of Smt Rajashree, the Complainant No. 1, availed loan from ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd., He obtained two insurance policies from the OP/Petitioner herein, i.e., the ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd., for a loan amount as well as for securing his own life. Unfortunately, on 23.05.2009 i.e. during currency of policies, Mr. Simant expired. The OP honored the claim under the policy for securing home loan, but after considerable delay and paid a sum of Rs.4,57,888/- only to the Finance Company, but not paid the interest for delayed payment. With regard to another Life policy, for a sum assured of Rs.5,00,000/-, the OP refused to pay. Hence, aggrieved thereby the Complainants approached the District Forum, Pune through Consumer Complaint No 188/2010.

2. The District Forum partly allowed the complaint and held the OP liable for unfair trade practice and ordered to pay Rs.25,000/- as compensation, and to refund the premium amount of Rs.4,121/-, with interest @ 15% per annum, from 17.12.2009 and Rs.10,000/- as litigation expenses, to the complain




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top