K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—In all these revision petitions question to be decided is common; hence, decided by common order.

2. These revision petitions have been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 07.11.2013 passed by the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in Appeal No. 785/2013 – M/s. Matrix Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shobhit Elhance & Ors., in Appeal No. 787/2013 – M/s. Matrix Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mahesh Kumar Haribhau Patil & Ors., in Appeal No. 789/2013 – M/s. Matrix Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ashish Kumar Gupta & Ors., in Appeal No. 790/2013 – M/s. Matrix Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Subir Majumdar & Ors., in Appeal No. 783/2013 – M/s. Matrix Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sanjeev Dhawan & Ors., in Appeal No. 784/2013 – M/s. Matrix Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Kumar Singh & Ors., in Appeal No. 786/2013 – M/s. Matrix Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Inder Kumar Parimoo & Ors. and in Appeal No. 788/2013 – M/s. Matrix Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vinod Bala Chadha & Ors. by which, while dismissing appeals in limine, order of District Forum allowing complaint partly was upheld.

3. Brief facts of the case are that Complain