V.K.JAIN, B.C.GUPTA
ICICI Bank – Appellant
Versus
Maharaj Krishan Datta – Respondent
V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainants availed home loan to the extent of Rs.13,35,100/- from the petitioner-ICICI Bank for purchase of a flat in Zirakpur. The loan was sanctioned vide letter dated 14.11.2005 and according to the complainants it carried interest @ 7.25% per annum. According to the complainants, the petitioner bank later confirmed that with effect from April, 2006, the loan would carry interest @ 7.75% per annum. An additional loan of Rs.3,00,000/- was sanctioned to the complainants on 30.10.2006 and the said loan, according to the complainants, carried an obligation to pay interest @ 8.75% per annum. Expressing a grievance that instead of charging interest at the agreed rate, the bank had charged the same @ 11.25% p.a. for the period from 01.4.2007 to 31.3.2008, besides charging interest during pre-EMI period @ 9.5% per annum, the complainants filed a complaint before the concerned District Forum, alleging deficiency in the service provided to them by the petitioner-Bank.
2. The complaint was resisted by the bank on the ground that the loan was sanctioned on the floating rate of interest, which at the time of sanction was 8.75% per annum and could be enha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.