SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN, B.C.GUPTA
Charanjeet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of Patiala, Through its Manager – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Manohar Pratap, Advocate.

ORDER (ORAL)

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainant took two housing loans, one in the year 2002 and other in the year 2005 from State Bank of Patiala, mortgaging property no. 2/231, Govindpura, Haldwani, while taking the aforesaid housing loan. The learned counsel for the petitioner complainant submits that in fact two title deeds in respect of two separate floors for the same property were deposited with the Bank. The husband of the complainant/petitioner had also availed credit facility from the Bank and the complainant had stood as a guarantor for repayment of the aforesaid housing loan taken by her husband. The complainant claims to have arranged fund from her relatives for payment of the housing loan taken by her and wanted the Bank to settle the housing loan account and release the title deeds which she had deposited with the Bank. It would be pertinent to note here that the complainant/petitioner had defaulted even in payment of the housing loan taken by her and had thereby become a defaulter. The Bank settled the housing loan taken in account no. 55048407615, but did not settle the housing loan taken in the other account, on the ground that being guarantor of the credi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top