SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK
Nand Lal Arora – Appellant
Versus
Branch Manager – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate.

ORDER

J. M. Malik, Presiding Member—Sh. Nand Lal Arora, Complainant, invested a sum of Rs.10,000/- in a Fixed Deposit in the name of Bhavya, a minor. The said Fixed Deposit was to mature on 13.02.2010. According to the Complainant, he went to the Branch Manager, UCO Bank, Mandi, H.P. OP-1. Other functionaries of the Bank are arrayed as OP-2 & 3in the original complaint. Sh. Nand Lal asked them to renew the said Fixed Deposit for one more year. The Bank retained the Fixed Deposit Receipt and did not return it to the Complainant on the plea that the record was not available. Legal notice was given to the Bank on 04.05.2013, but, that did not evoke any response. Thereafter, this case was filed before the District Forum.

2. During the pendency of the complaint, the OPs sent a cheque of Rs.33,503/- on account of money due on the FDR, in question, on 19.06.2013. The case of the OPs is a wee bit different. It is averred that Sh. Nand Lal, Respondent, had approached the Bank in June, 2012 for renewal of FDR. It transpired then, that the minor Bhavya had attained majority by that time. The Complainant was asked to give proof of identification of the FDR holder. The OP contended that the Compl






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top