SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member, Suresh Chandra, Member
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana , Panchkula —Petitioner
versus
M/s. Religare Securities Ltd., Through its Managing Director & Ors. —Respondents
Revision Petition No.3382 of 2010
(From order dated 17.5.2010 in First Appeal No.509/2010 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission)
Decided on 30.1.2015

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Nemo.

IMPORTANT POINT
Disputes between parties relating to commercial purposes are excluded under C. P. Act.

Headnote:Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Sections 15, 17, 19 and 21—Capital market—Deficiency in service—Unauthorised sale of shares—Complaint dismissed by Fora below—Petitioner had been indulging regularly in shares trading business—Petitioner has nowhere pleaded in his complaint that he is doing share business for self- employment—Nor, he has been pleaded that services provided by respondents were being availed of exclusively for the purpose of earning of his livelihood by means of self-employment—Disputes between parties relating to commercial purposes are excluded under the Act—Since petitioner had been trading regularly in share business and same being commercial activity, petitioner would not fall under definition of ‘Consumer’ as per the Act—Regular trading in sale and purchase of shares is a purely commercial activity and only motive is to earn profits—State Commission has not committed any jurisdictional error in passing impugned order—Moreover, complaint filed before District Forum was also barred by limitation—Revision Petition dismissed with cost of Rs.5,000/-. (Paras 14, 17 to 20)

       Result: Revision Petition dismissed.

       

ORDER

V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member—Petitioner/Complainant, has filed the present revision petition under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act,1986 (for short, ‘Act’), against order dated 17.5.2010 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula (for short, ‘State Commission’) in F.A. No.509 of 2010.

2. Brief facts are that Petitioner/Complainant has been having business of shares with the Respondent No.1/Opposite Party No.1 through their agent, Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.2. Petitioner was allotted account No.KK-85 and respondent no.1 was to provide margin money of 20% and 80% at the rate of 15% p.a. Petitioner had issued a cheque no.161549 dated 16.5.2006 in favour of respondent no.1 on account of deficiency in margin money to be maintained at 20%. The said cheque was not credited in the account of the petitioner, rather it was illegally credited in the account no.SJ-65 of Satpal Juneja (earlier agent of respondent no.1). The petitioner obtained statement of his account and share holdings from respondent no.1 and came to know that his shares worth Rs. 9,34,602.85 Ps. of Siemens and Ultra Tech companies were illegally sold due to non-credit of the amount of cheque dated 16.5.2006, which caused him a loss of Rs. 2,92,240.50 Ps. Similarly, 750 shares of Ultra Tech were also sold unauthorisedly at the lower rate causing a loss of Rs. 6,109.11Ps to him. In this way, petitioner suffered a total loss of Rs. 2,98,349.26 Ps.

3. Petitioner filed (Complaint Case No.332 of 2006) before the District Forum for the above said loss, which was decided in his favour on 3.8.2007. Respondent No.1 and its agent Satpal Juneja, were jointly and severally directed to pay Rs.2,98,349/- to the petitioner with Rs.one lakh as compensation and Rs.3,300/- as cost of litigation. When respondent no.1 and its agent Satpal Juneja, failed to comply with the said order, the petitioner filed a execution petition during pendency of which, respondent no.1 paid a sum of Rs.4,34,570/- to the petitioner on 11.9.2008. So, the said petition was withdrawn as fully satisfied.

4. During pendency of the above said complaint, respondent no.1 had filed written reply dated 28.11.2006 alongwith copy of statement of account of the petitioner showing the sale of another 6000 shares of Andhra Bank Ltd. of the petitioner on 25.5.2006 at the rate of Rs.68.3646 Ps. per share without his consent and permission, whereas the same were purchased at the rate of Rs.96.50 ps. per share. In this way, the petitioner was caused a loss of Rs.2,15,373/- which amounts to deficiency of service on the part of respondent no.1.

5. Petitioner, thereafter obtained copy of statement of account from May,2005 to 21.3.2008 from the office of respondent no.2. In the said documents, 200 shares of L&T company are shown with closing rate of Rs.1083.95 Ps, whereas it should be 400 shares (200+200) bonus shares) with the said rate or the rate of 200 shares should have been Rs.2,167.90 Ps. In the same way, rate of 10 shares of Revalgaon Sugar has been shown Rs.2,400/-, whereas it should have been Rs.5,024.45 Ps. per share. The rate of 2,500 shares of Venus Sugar has also not been shown in these documents. On 6.10.2008, petitioner was supplied a copy of statement of account w.e.f. 1.4.2008 to 7.10.2008 showing opening balance of credit of Rs.2,28,636.61 Ps. as on 1.4.2008 and the opening balance of debit of Rs.17,32,668.77 Ps. Besides, rate of interest being charged from day to day has been shown as 16% as against the agreed rate of 15% p.a. Respondent No.2 also demanded a sum of Rupees Five lakh from the petitioner on 6.10.2008 to complete the alleged deficiency in the margin of 20% to be maintained by the petitioner without any shortage of margin money in his account. Alleging above said acts of respondents as deficiency in service on their part, petitioner sought a direction to respondents to pay Rs.2,15,373/- for the illegal sale of 6000 shares of Andhra Bank Ltd with inte






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top