Suresh Chandra, Member—The petitioner/opposite party No.1 has preferred this revision petition against the order dated 9.7.2013 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh passed in F.A No.2083 of 2010 whereby the State Commission has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner filed against the order dated 25.10.2010 passed by the District Forum in complaint no.35 of 2010. By its order, the District Forum allowed the complaint filed by respondent No.1/complainant and directed the opposite party Nos.1 & 2/petitioner and respondent No.2 respectively to pay compensation of Rs.20,000/- and litigation expenses of Rs.5,000/- besides returning the motorcycle in question in the same condition in which it was snatched from the complainant.

2. As per the averments made in the complaint, the complainant purchased motorcycle of Hero Honda CD Deluxe make which was financed by the petitioner from whom he had taken a loan of Rs. 24,400/-. By way of repayment of the loan, he paid amounts on different dates against which receipts were issued in some cases and no receipt was issued in some other cases. The details are given in the complaint. As per the allegation,