M. Shreesha, Member—This Revision Petition, by the Petitioner, calls in question the correctness and legality of order dated 28.08.2007 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai in Appeal No.1724 of 2006 – Shri Mukund Damodar Raghuvir vs. CIDCO Limited. The Petitioner/complainant also filed MA No.1988 of 2007 in Appeal No.1724 of 2006 seeking review of the order which the State Commission dismissed on the ground that it does not have powers of review.

2. The brief facts of the case as set out in the complaint are that the Revision Petitioner booked a flat under the Demand Registration Scheme 87 admeasuring area of 85 sq. mt. on 14.7.1987 and paid an amount of Rs. 85,000/-. In the year 1990, he was informed by the Opposite Party that the price had increased to Rs.3,74,760/- and the Complainant/Petitioner had paid the same. Possession of the flat was given to him on 18.1.1994. It is the main grievance of the Petitioner that after possession he had got his flat measured and the area was much lesser than what was shown in the sale deed and that he has also paid excess price for the same. Thereafter, he approached the Opposite Party, who denied t