J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
Haryana State Pharmacy Council – Appellant
Versus
Sheela Devi – Respondent
J.M. Malik, Presiding Member—Counsel for the parties present. Arguments heard.
2. Ms. Sheela Devi, the complainant, took admission in D-Pharmacy with Tirupati College of Pharmacy/OP2 in the Academic Year 2008-09. She had completed the Diploma course in the year 2010. She applied for registration with Haryana State Pharmacy Council, OP1, along with the requisite fees. Her application was kept pending and she was informed that enquiry was being made. In the meantime, the complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum. The District Forum allowed the complaint and directed the OP1 to register her as one of the candidates for the Pharmacy course.
3. The State Commission dismissed the appeal filed by Haryana State Pharmacy Council, OP1.
4. In the meantime, the Pharmacy Council of India, passed the following order, on 16.12.2014:
“With reference to the subject cited above, I am directed to inform that subject cited issue was considered by Executive Committee of the PCI in its meeting held in December, 2014, which decided to intimate that B. Sc. (Home Science) after matriculation without doing 10+2 is not approved under Regulation 5 of the Education Regulations, 1991 for admiss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.