SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
Yelchuri Subrahmanyam – Appellant
Versus
Buddi Sankara Babu – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants: Ms. Kirti Sethi, Amicus Curiae

ORDER

J.M. Malik, Presiding Member —Amicus Curiae for the petitioners present. The case was dismissed in default. In the interest of justice, the case is restored to its original number. The other parties have already been proceeded against ex-parte. M.A. No.4 of 2015 stands disposed of.

2. Arguments heard. The complainants namely, Yelchuri Subrahmanyam, Yelchuri Lakshmi Parvathi and Yelchuri Padmaja Kumari- husband, wife and their daughter, entered into an agreement with Buddi Sankara Babu-OP-1 and Konijeti Bhadarnarayana-OP-2, who claim to be the owners of vacant site under “Suryanarayana Housing Colony (Vema Vari Colony)”, Swarna Road, Chirala. An advance payment in the sum of Rs.10,000/- was taken by the OPs on 27/06/2005 and 29.06.2005. Registered sale deed was executed by the OPs-1 & 2. Although, they had promised that the plot No.33 would be given but the sale deed showed plot No.39 instead of plot No.33. They also took the full payment in the sum of Rs.63,000/-.

3. Subsequently, it transpired that flat No.39 was not approved in the original layout plan. The complainants had to spend Rs.15,914/- for the layout approval. OPs-1 & 2 claimed that OP-3 –Vema Mallikarjuna Rao, Vema A


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top