NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
V.K. Jain, Presiding Member
United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Through Regional Manager —Petitioner
versus
Sunil Gupta & Anr. —Respondents
Revision Petition No. 4558 of 2014
(Against the Order dated 08/09/2014 in Appeal No. 1173/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)
Decided on 7.4.2015
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sidharth Singh, Advocate for Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Sagar Saxena, Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Kumar Gill, Advocate
IMPORTANT POINT
Best treatment option for morbid obesity is Bariatric surgery wherein Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass is a treatment option.
Headnote:Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Sections 15, 17, 19 and 21—Insurance—Mediclaim Policy—Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass surgery—Change of life or even lifestyle is not involved in a surgical procedure for treatment of morbid obesity—Case of petitioner that bariatric surgery for morbid obesity is a cosmetic or aesthetic treatment which is excluded under clause 4.5(b) of insurance policy issued to complainant, cannot be accepted—It was not aimed at improving physical appearance of complainant or to enhance his beauty—It was aimed at ensuring that he does not develop complications which may later prove to be life threatening—View taken by District Forum as regards nature of treatment taken by complainant cannot be faulted with—Petitioner company directed to pay amount of Rs.1,84,688/- along with 10% interest. (Paras 8 to 10)
Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Sections 15, 17, 19 and 21—Insurance—Mediclaim Policy—Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass surgery—Change of life or even lifestyle is not involved in a surgical procedure for treatment of morbid obesity—Case of petitioner that bariatric surgery for morbid obesity is a cosmetic or aesthetic treatment which is excluded under clause 4.5(b) of insurance policy issued to complainant, cannot be accepted—It was not aimed at improving physical appearance of complainant or to enhance his beauty—It was aimed at ensuring that he does not develop complications which may later prove to be life threatening—View taken by District Forum as regards nature of treatment taken by complainant cannot be faulted with—Petitioner company directed to pay amount of Rs.1,84,688/- along with 10% interest. (Paras 8 to 10)
Result: Revision Petition disposed of.
V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainant/respondent obtained a mediclaim policy namely Health Insurance Policy-Gold from the petitioner United India Insurance Co. Ltd. for the period from 01-12-2007 to 30-11-2008. Since the complainant was suffering from morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, etc., his weight being 164.6 kg., he consulted the doctors in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital who advised bariatric surgery to him. On the advice of the doctors he was admitted to the aforesaid hospital on 22-06-2008 and subjected to Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass surgery, a surgical procedure for treating morbid obesity and was discharged on 26-06-2008. The complainant paid a sum of Rs.1,84,688/- for the aforesaid surgery and related procedures. The complainant, thereafter, submitted a claim to the petitioner company, seeking reimbursement in terms of the mediclaim policy taken by him. Vide letter dated 01-04-2009 the insurance company rejected the claim in terms of clause 4.5(b) of the mediclaim policy taken by the complainant. Being aggrieved from the rejection of his claim the complainant approached the concerned District Forum seeking a direction to the insurance company to pay the aforesaid amount of Rs.1,84,688/- to him along with interest at the rate of 24% per annum. He also sought compensation amounting to Rs.3,00,000/- and cost of litigation amounting to Rs.15,000/-.
2. The complaint was opposed by the insurance company primarily on the ground that the treatment taken by the complainant was excluded under clause 4.5(b) of the policy taken by him and, therefore, it had rightly been repudiated by the company.
3. Vide its order dated 19-07-2012 the District Forum issued the following direction to the petitioner company:
a. pay to the complainant a sum of Rs.1,84,688/- along with interest @10% per annum from the date of filing of this complaint i.e.20-04-2009 till payment,
b. pay to the complainant a sum of Rs.25,000/- towards compensation for pain and agony suffered by him and
c. pay to the complainant a sum of Rs.5,000/- as the cost of litigation.
4. Being aggrieved from the order passed by the District Forum the petitioner company approached the concerned State Commission by way of an appeal. Since there was a delay of 80 days in filing the appeal an application seeking condonation of the said delay was also filed by the petitioner. Vide order dated 08-09-2014 the State Commission dismissed the application seeking condonation of delay and consequently rejected the appeal as barred by limitation. Being aggrieved from rejection of its appeal the insurance company is before this Commission by way of this revision petition.
5. Clause 4.5 (b) of the mediclaim policy, on which reliance is placed by the insurance company for repudiating the claim reads as under:
“Exclusions:- The company shall not be liable to make any payment under this policy in respect of any expenses whatsoever incurred by any Insured Person in connection with or in respect of:
“vaccination or inoculation or change of life or cosmetic or aesthetic treatment of any description.”
6. Therefore, the question which arises for consideration in this petition is as to whether the procedure undergone by the complainant is covered under clause 4.5(b) extracted hereinabove. Admittedly the complainant had not undergone vaccination or inoculation. Therefore, what we have to examine in this petition is as to whether he had undergone a procedure in connection with or in respect of change of life or which can be said to be cosmetic or aesthetic. The change of life or even lifestyle is not involved in a surgical procedure for treatment of morbid obesity. Hence, the issue to be examined is as to whether the aforesaid procedure can be said to be a cosmetic or aesthetic procedure. The word ‘cosmetic’ has been defined as under in Oxford Advance Learner’s Dictionary (8th edition):
“noun – a substance that you put on your face or body to make it more attractive.
Adj. – 1.impro