SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN, B.C.GUPTA
Kuldeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
Syndicate Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Avanish Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

V.K.Jain, Presiding Member—The petitioner, who has an account with the respondent Syndicate Bank, Civil Lines, Roorkee had a credit balance of Rs. 4,51,177.69/- for the aforesaid account as on 31.03.2009. The petitioner had also stood as guarantor for a loan which the aforesaid bank had granted to M/s. Hamara Enterprises through one Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma bearing cash credit account no. 87361250000269. Since M/s. Hamara Enterprises did not repay the loan taken from the bank, it turned into a Non Performing Asset and the petitioner being guarantor for the aforesaid loan, a sum of Rs. 4,43,000/- was transferred from his bank account to the loan account of M/s. Hamara Enterprises. Being aggrieved from the aforesaid transfer of money from his account, the petitioner approached the concerned District Forum by way of a complaint.

2. The complaint was resisted by the bank primarily on the ground that since M/s. Hamara Enterprises did not repay the loan taken from the bank and the petitioner/complainant had stood as a guarantor in respect of the aforesaid loan, they sent registered notices dated 18.07.2008 and 20.03.2009 to him, requiring him to close the loan account of M/


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top